California’s transit agencies request emergency funding relief to prevent permanent cuts to local service

The following is a news release issued Wednesday by the California Transit Association, which represents transit agencies across the state, including Metro:

California Transit Association issues formal request for relief funding to state and federal leadership, launches “California Without Transit” statewide ad campaign

SACRAMENTO – California’s local public transit agencies, suffering from billions of dollars in losses due to reduced ridership and plummeting farebox and tax revenues from the COVID-19 pandemic, warned state and federal lawmakers that they are facing an existential threat that jeopardizes the economic, social, and physical well-being of the communities in which they operate.

Yesterday, on behalf of its more than 85 local public transit agency members, the California Transit Association submitted a letter to Governor Newsom and state and federal lawmakers requesting at least $3.1 billion in funding relief this year to help prevent devastating permanent service reductions.

At the same time, the Association launched a statewide digital advertising campaign, to demonstrate to elected leaders and the public the dire consequences of diminished or eliminated public transportation for communities across the state .

“The worldwide health pandemic has put California’s public transit agencies in crisis, with many agencies at risk of permanently eliminating or reducing bus, train and other transit services,” said Joshua W. Shaw, Executive Director of the California Transit Association. “Without state or federal support, local public transit agencies may be forced to make cuts that threaten economic recovery and disproportionately hurt disadvantaged communities.”

Local public transit service is indispensable to the functioning of California communities, transporting essential workers to jobs, while supporting economic activity and social justice. This emergency funding relief would ensure public transportation is still available for communities most in need.

“Data show that those riding public transit today are essential workers and overwhelmingly women, low-income, and people of color who lack access to other mobility options,” said Jeffrey Tumlin, Director of Transportation, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. “Viable public transit is essential to protecting strong and healthy communities and to avoid the loss of thousands of local jobs.”

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, many transit agencies saw their ridership decline by more than 90 percent, driving down passenger fare revenue. As the crisis continues, agencies statewide are now grappling with significant drops in state and local sales tax revenues, undercutting a key transit funding source for many local transit agencies.

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority anticipates a $1.8 billion shortfall in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.  The agency has seen ridership declines ranging between 65-75 percent.

“Like many public transportation agencies throughout the state, we have been forced to reduce services that provide lifeline service for essential and frontline workers and disadvantaged communities,” said Metro CEO Phil Washington, “Additional state and federal resources are needed to prevent steep losses of public transportation services that our county residents desperately need.”

Without additional funding, it could take years for public transit to recover from today’s crisis. If the mobility options offered by public transit were to disappear, California risks seeing spikes in unemployment rates in underserved communities due to lack of reliable transportation to work, and worsened health outcomes and more traffic congestion associated with increased automobile traffic and use of personal vehicles.

State or federal funding relief is critical to ensuring transit agencies can continue providing the vital services needed for a balanced economic recovery, quality of life and to achieving the state’s ambitious environmental goals.

5 replies

  1. We the Bus Operators deserve more respect. I understand that we are in a global pandemic right now but cutting hours is absurd, being that we are the backbone of company; make cuts elsewhere. We are not receiving hazardous pay which is quite embarrassing being that we the Operators are not showed the respect that we so do deserve. We have families to take care of and we would like to go home to them well and healthy. I do thank Metro for having an abundance of PPE for it’s Bus Operator at Div 1. Montebello shut down service for the safety of the Bus Operators. While Metro continues in service, serving the general public, mostly the homeless. I pray that we get the hazardous pay that we so do deserve.

  2. You know, if America actually cared for their transit systems, like other countries do. . . And that includes both the agencies and the patrons, then maybe. . . Just maybe, this wouldn’t be necessary even in the middle of a Pandemic, yet we keep seeing the same exact actions from everyone. It’s a cycle that won’t end. I guess Americans really aren’t gonna learn their lesson from this pandemic, ehh.

  3. Let the people in the front door mandatory mask at all time like the governor is asking from the public at all establishments. Or put tap card machine in rear entrance. People think it’s free and always ask do we have to pay now? Especially when front door opens and no seat belts block them to have access thru the front. Essential workers is not the majority people riding this busses ride the 45, 251,81,4,2,20 etc all day you’ll see what type of non workers ride the bus and no mask at all the onedls who wear mask are the most responsible. The homeless don’t always aquire this mask and cannot be refused service. It’s fair to open the front door already as long as mask always on and be able to refuse service.

  4. Two suggestions to reduce costs and increase revenue for the MTA. The MTA should look internally as to how many critical employees it actually needs in its non revenue departments with those employees who jobs are being eliminated offered jobs in transportation such as Bus Operators and Mechanics, The second suggestion is for the MTA to readjust its ridership verses funding to reflect the actual cost of providing service. If I’m not mistaken the MTA transports approx. 80% of those riding buses in the county but only receives 60% of the tax subsidies. This is because many local agencies, i.e. Santa Monica, Long Beach, etc. offer lower fares and can not survive on the 20% they are actually entitled to. Not only that, local agencies have continued to infringe on the MTA’s operating areas duplicating service on long established routes.