Metro staff on Friday released a draft of the Metro Vision 2028 Plan as part of a report to the agency’s Board of Directors.
This is Metro’s big picture plan to improve mobility in Los Angeles County and explains what the public can expect from the agency over the next 10 years. The plan is the result of more than 17 months of research, discussion and outreach by Metro’s Office of Extraordinary Innovation.
As we all know, traffic is one of the critical issues facing L.A. County. Mobility is directly related to our region’s future and its economic and social promise. Better mobility means safe and convenient access to the basic needs in your life, such as more job opportunities, housing, education and health services. The plan seeks to provide great mobility to everyone, whether they drive, take transit, walk or bike.
The plan builds on some key initiatives already underway now at Metro — and includes strategic actions that go well beyond the status quo. Vision 2028 sets Metro’s strategic direction and serves as the foundation for all other Metro plans, programs and services. For example, the in-progress Long Range Transportation Plan and the NextGen Bus Study will take a deeper and more detailed focus on how we will accomplish goals in Vision 2028.
Vision 2028 will be formally released to the public on April 27 followed by a four-week public comment period. The Metro Board of Directors will consider adopting the plan at their meeting on June 28.
Here are some of the highlights that will likely be most interesting to Source readers:
•The plan shifts Metro’s focus from just the system Metro operates to the mobility ecosystem as a whole. We are not just a transit agency – we are a mobility agency.
•The plan emphasizes spending less time traveling. For example, the plan calls for:
- Improving average speeds on the bus network by 30 percent;
- Updating the way we manage our aging transit assets to keep them in a state of good repair, thus reducing trip disruptions on our buses and trains;
- Implementing a larger network of ExpressLanes by 2028, thus providing solo drivers a choice to pay a toll in order to save time while also improving the performance of our bus rapid transit services that run along such corridors;
- Piloting pricing strategies to manage demand in the most traffic-clogged parts of LA County.
•Metro will focus on improving the customer experience and making our system easier and more convenient to use. Putting the customer at the heart of the journey is critical to improving mobility.
The above are just a few highlights. The plan also tackles housing, safety and security, fares, agency finances and creating more jobs across the region. Ultimately, we hope you’ll join us as we build a better transportation future for L.A. County.
Categories: Policy & Funding, Projects
How about the Gold Line extension for Whittier? The mass transit we have here in this part of the county stinks. The busses are stuck in traffic just like everyone else what are your plans for this area we at taxes also.
Great to see discussion of more bus-only lanes, BRT, signal priority, and queue jumps for buses. Metro should take a similar approach to rail. If the agency is serious about improving mobility and moving the greatest number of people as quickly as possible, it will implement signal preemption at ALL RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS, PERIOD.
Having desirable goals is only a start. What is drastically needed are specific plans to accomplish these goals.
In particular, how many of the various projects planned for Measure M will implemented in the 2018-2028 time frame?
I realize that I am sounding like a broken record, but Foothill Transit, Long Beach Transit, and Santa Monica Transit and even the smaller transit agencies (Gardena, Pasadena, Norwalk, etc.,) MUST BE AN INTEGRAL PART of ANY 2018-2028 plan.
More important, the surrounding counties (Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and LAST BUT NOT LEAST Ventura) ALL must also be involved due the fact that they are destined to grow much faster than is Los Angeles County.. This is because there is considerable iter-county automobile traffic that to date has received negligible attention by OCTA, RTA, VCTA, and Omnitrans.
Thee was an OCTA-LA Metro study of transit crossing the OC-LA County Line (see http://media.metro.net/board/Items/2008/04_april/20080416P&PItem7Handout.pdf) but is seems nothing came about as a result. A sad-but-true typical result.
There was also a SCAG Regional Transportation Plan (at http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/final/f2012RTPSCS.pdf) that also stressed the need for more inter-county coordination in their section on transit at (http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/final/SR/2012fRTP_Transit.pdf). However, I see little progress made or even planned for in the future.
To repeat, to really be effective, we desperately need a reincarnation of the ORIGINAL SCRTD into a FIVE county Southern California Regional Transportation Authority or SCRTA. Until then I really see no hope for success.except in portions of LA County..