From the Dept. of Comments: This is directed at one reader. If you continue to submit multiple comments from multiple user names using the same IP address, I’ll continue to delete those comments. Be honest — choose a single name (preferably your real one) and follow the rules like everyone else.
Things to read whilst transiting: ESPN offers some predictions for the 2016 NFL season, including the 49ers going to the playoffs (boo!) and the Rams using four different QBs, including RGIII. (I actually think the Rams picking up RGIII would be a smart move). But it’s prediction No. 10 that tooted my horn.
Art of Transit:
Art of Transit 2:
From the Dept. of Good News from the Federal Government:
President Obama’s proposed budget was issued today. Metro secured a recommendation of $375 million for its rail projects — basically money from larger grants that is being doled out by the feds on a year-by-year basis:
•$125 million for the Regional Connector
•$125 million for the Westside Purple Line Extension – Section 1
•$125 million for the Westside Purple Line Extension – Section 2
Also today, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued their apportionment for fiscal year 2016 funds appropriated by Congress last year:
•$100 million for the Regional Connector
•$100 million for the Westside Purple Line Extension – Section 1
•$100 million for the Westside Purple Line Extension – Section 2
Here’s the full news release from Metro.
Preliminary federal ruling sides with Beverly Hills against Metro subway (Streetsblog LA)
Here is Metro’s statement — and I can’t underscore enough the importance of the first sentence:
After a thorough review, Metro concludes that Judge Wu’s tentative rulings uphold the approved plans to build the Century City subway station at Constellation and to tunnel safely beneath Beverly Hills High School. Some of the findings are procedural, requiring the FTA to perform additional environmental analysis and provide a further opportunity for public comment. The majority of extensive environmental work was deemed sound. If the ruling holds, Metro will support FTA in meeting these additional procedural requirements. Time is of the essence. Any significant delay resulting from this case could jeopardize the timely delivery of this critically important transit project for all L.A. County residents.
The judge will decide a “remedy” for the case at a future hearing.
Here are the parking rates coming to nine Metro stations (LA Magazine)
Metro going to start charging for parking at rail stations (Curbed LA)
All sorts of interesting things can be found on those Service Council agendas, eh? 🙂
Please see this Source post about the proposed test program. One thing to emphasize: the Metro Board still must decide whether to go forward with the fees. That is scheduled to happen in March.
One interesting aside: if you look at park-and-ride lots at light rail stations across the western U.S., free parking is still mostly the norm. It’s worth noting that many light rail lines in the West are relatively new and it seems unlikely to me that free parking will last, assuming the cost of providing it and ridership goes up over the years.
The one exception is for the Bay Area’s BART, which does charge fees. It’s an older system (and yes, it’s more similar to our subway than light rail) and has the highest rail ridership of the western states with about 455,000 average weekday boardings (that doesn’t count Muni or VTA light rail, which also operate in the Bay Area). FWIW, Metro Rail had an estimated 333,000 average weekday boardings, according to the latest numbers.
In plain English: the Bay Area has the highest ridership on its rail transit system. Metro has the second-highest. So perhaps not a shocker the parking lots are busy in either metro area.
Mike Bonin’s big idea (Argonaut)
More housing — especially the affordable kind — is especially what the Westside needs (Streetsblog LA)
Metro recently quietly closed its long-time bus yard at the corner of Rose and Main in Venice. L.A. Councilmember and Metro Board Member Mike Bonin thinks the three-acre site is perfect for affordable housing.
Metro is retaining the land and has a Board-adopted policy that 35 percent of any residential units built there should be “affordable units.” The Argonaut also reports that “Bonin sees possibilities for public parking, open space and “workforce housing” for teachers, nurses and other moderate-income professionals.”
Steep increase in U.S. roadway deaths (NHTSA)
Early estimates show a 9.3 percent increase in car fatalities in the first nine months of 2015 compared to the same time in 2014. The increase for our region (California and Arizona) was an increase of three percent. Excerpt:
NHTSA estimates that more than 26,000 people died in traffic crashes in the first nine months of 2015, compared to the 23,796 fatalities in the first nine months of 2014. U.S. regions nationwide showed increases ranging from 2 to 20 percent. View the report
The estimated increase in highway deaths follows years of steady, gradual declines. Traffic deaths declined 1.2 percent in 2014 and more than 22 percent from 2000 to 2014.
Two charts worth checking out from the report:
After the Great Recession, there were a lot of stories about the sea change concerning Americans and driving — our mileage was down, deaths were down, teens were waiting to get licenses, etc. The fewer-teens-driving still seems to be true but mileage is up and safety is down — and I see no real reason to think our nation’s love affair with the car has fundamentally changed.
Recent How We Rolls
Feb. 8: ExpressLanes tolls and what went wrong with our Super Bowl pick.
Feb. 5: can personal virtue ever drive up transit ridership?
Feb. 4: would the Expo Line have won KPCC’s bike-car-bus race between DTLA and DTSM?
Feb. 3: will bus-only lanes rise again?
Feb. 2: the hills are alive with more talk about transit ridership.
Categories: Transportation Headlines
Mero should consider discounts or free parking for carpoolers and those with emission free vehicles
Metro’s goal is to have 20% of the county use transit. If we say only 10% of the 10 mil population get into transit or 1 million folks.. And since we know 75% of LA commuters drive to work alone…that means 750,000 using daily. Then why does Metro construct a light rail line through west la into Santa Monica and not provide adequate parking? The goal is to build successful light rail in a sprawling metropolitan area. A key component is park and ride. Your park and ride infrastructure should be 4 to 5 times its size like Calgary, Canada. These are your future customers and they will never come to use transit simply because there will be no place to park their cars. You are creating barriers to your customers of tomorrow.
LA, in general, has much greater density than Calgary. While large, inexpensive parking may be feasible on the outskirts of the Calgary core, the same can not be said along the current and future rail lines in LA — further, adding large garages only shifts traffic patterns and does not necessarily alleviate car usage. The density of LA also affords much greater likelihood of walking, biking or taking a bus to connect to rail. The LA weather further makes biking and walking doable. I don’t think anyone actually thinks that transit will take all the cars off the road, but it will provide a reasonable alternative for many and over generations, taking the train in LA will become more common and acceptable for many who currently view public transportation as something for the poor. LA will never be NYC or London or Tokyo, but in time, things will improve and improve significantly
Bonin expects Metro to just give away the land in Venice so affordable housing can be built? That is not fair to Metro or the public transit community. We are talking a parcel of land with more than $30M in value, which is the equivalent of Metro’s parking pilot program proceeds for 50 years.
I couldn’t agree with you more, ABSOLUTELY NO LAND GIVE AWAY. If they want the property, let someone pay full market value for the property. Even better, let METRO develop the property themselves or with a partner and retain the profits.
It isn’t fair to the taxpayers in Los Angeles County to give this property away. METRO should be required, by law, to either sell unused property at FULL MARKET VALUE or develop/repurpose ANY unused property.