Today’s profile of a Metro rider by Zocalo Public Square: I’m thinking about the tons of work I’m behind on, Victoria Avenue to Market Street
Transportation emerges as crucial to escaping poverty (New York Times)
In a large, continuing study of upward mobility based at Harvard, commuting time has emerged as the single strongest factor in the odds of escaping poverty. The longer an average commute in a given county, the worse the chances of low-income families there moving up the ladder.
The impact of transportation on social mobility is stronger than several other factors, like crime, elementary-school test scores or the percentage of two-parent families in a community, said Nathaniel Hendren, a Harvard economist and one of the researchers on the study. It notes the connection in places with notoriously long commutes and poverty including Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Fla., and Birmingham, Ala.
A New York University report found much the same thing — areas with some but inefficient access to transit had the most unemployment.
I don’t think the findings are exactly shocking, but they are interesting. And they certainly reinforce the point that a big robust transit network does more than just help people avoid traffic.
For goodness sake, stop widening the 405 (Streetsblog LA)
The OC’s plans to widen the 405 freeway between Costa Mesa and the L.A. County line earns the wrath of Streetsblog editor Damien Newton, who argues that widening the freeway will create even more traffic. He also says that will inevitably lead to Metro funding a widening between the county line and the Westside to prevent a bottleneck.
A Metro official recently told KPCC that there’s no funding for such a project although the agency plans to do a feasibility study of a widening for five miles of the 405 in Long Beach to see if that’s something even possible. The one thing that’s certainly interesting about the OC’s plans are that the widening will allow for two HOV/toll lanes in each direction.
Phil Washington begins at Metro’s new CEO on May 11. His salary was announced when the Metro Board hired him in April; the LAT article takes a look at some of the other benefits. For those interested, Metro’s website does have a page listing salaries for executive-level positions.
In a car-obsessed city, learning to love mass transit (New York Times)
Another New York Times story with more New York attitude toward L.A. will surely raise the hackles of some and inspire a wave of indignation toward San Francisco East. In this article, a reporter travels to L.A. and tries to get around to a variety of destinations using only Metro, Commuter Express buses (run by the city of L.A.), the FlyAway bus from LAX (also run by the city) and Metrolink.
It doesn’t always go smoothly. But some parts of his transit travels seemed to work. Here’s the graph that includes a sentence that I’m guessing will offend the most Angelenos:
Soon I was gliding through downtown, surrounded by commuters. The Orange Line terminated at North Hollywood, where we descended to the Red Line. A subway in Los Angeles: What a concept! A clean, well-appointed subway at that, with a train that arrived within minutes.
As my colleague Joe Lemon noted, the reporter probably would have been better off staying in downtown L.A. rather than an unnamed hotel near the 405 freeway (I’m guessing the Luxe at Sunset and the 405). The reporter also says he used Metro’s trip planner but let’s face it: savvy Angelenos often check both the trip planner and Google Transit, which sometimes have different ideas about getting from Point A to Point B.
All that said, I thought the story was fine — the fact is that learning another city’s transit system usually takes some time.
Nor do I mind some transit indignation from those traveling from Gotham to L.A. After all, 56 percent of Gothamites use transit to commute to work versus 11 percent of Los Angeles workers, according to the Census Bureau. And let’s face it: Metropolis has 232 miles of subway system versus our 87 miles of subway and light rail, not to mention three busy commuter railroads and the PATH trains that connect Manhattan to New Jersey. Why do you think Superman, Batman and Spider-man all reside in Metropolis/Gotham/SF East? There’s a lot more trains to save from the Ras Al Ghuls and Doc Ocks of the world!
All that said, I think it’s worth mentioning that the NYT reporter probably would have benefited from several Measure R projects in the works, most notably the Crenshaw/LAX Line (which will include a station that will connect to LAX terminals via a people mover to be built by LAX) and perhaps the Purple Line Extension, which will eventually connect downtown L.A. to Westwood.
The reporter would probably have been smart to do what those visiting Apple Grande and most other cities do: get around by various means, including transit, taxi, rideshare and foot. On our end of things, I think our area — Metro included — probably could do a better job providing mobility advice to those visiting our area.
Your thoughts on the NYT article, readers?
Categories: Transportation Headlines