Have a transportation-related article you think should be included in headlines? Drop me an email! And don’t forget, Metro is on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Pick your social media poison!
Yes to an Arts District subway stop (Downtown News)
The editorial praises Metro CEO Art Leahy for directing Metro staff to study adding subway stations at 1st Street and 6th Street along existing Metro tracks. As some know, the tracks for the Red/Purple Line subway continue south from Union Station to a rail maintenance yard along the Los Angeles River and adjacent to the emerging Arts District.
This idea has been kicking around for years — and has been pushed in the past by L.A. Councilman Tom LaBonge. Excerpt:
The neighborhood has become one of the hottest communities in Los Angeles and is seeing a blitz of development. The 438-apartment One Santa Fe is rising east of the Southern California Institute of Architecture, and Legendary Development is preparing to break ground this year on a nearby 472-unit rental complex. Other housing projects already exist throughout the area, including three buildings developed by the firm Linear City in the southern portion of the district. Being able to get these people from their homes to the center of Downtown, or other neighborhoods throughout the region, without climbing into a car has obvious benefits.
Then there is the biggest project coming to the area: In 2015, work will start on a $401 million replacement of the Sixth Street Viaduct. The project will improve connections between the Arts District and Boyle Heights, and include recreation areas on the banks of the Los Angeles River.
All of this activity means that the district could wind up in a traffic crush. That is a serious concern, considering that stakeholders have already experienced the first pangs of congestion and parking shortages. Wouldn’t it be refreshing to be in front of a problem rather than play catch-up later?
We’ll see what happens — the obvious challenge is figuring out how to get people from a presumed street level train platform safely into the Arts District. I don’t believe anything is imminent but it sounds like an exciting idea, especially with the subway extension soon to start construction along Wilshire Boulevard.
Editorial: planning for the future (Santa Monica Daily Press)
The newspaper urges the Santa Monica City Council to approve plans tonight for the Bergamot Transit Village, located near the future Expo Line 26th/Bergamot station (it’s at 26th and Olympic). Excerpt:
Growth is inevitable. Santa Monica and the rest of the region will continue to attract more people. Whether it’s the 22-year-old graduate from MIT looking to strike it big with her next smartphone application, the New Jersey native stepping off the bus with dreams of Hollywood stardom or the young couple about to start a family, population growth cannot be stopped. Therefore, we must find ways to accept it and manage it as best we can. Without building more housing or more office space, Santa Monica will be unprepared to deal with the increase in demand. Rents will skyrocket, young families will be pushed out and this city will be further strangled by gridlock and falter from a lack of diversity.
The Hines project, with its combination of office space, retail and housing, helps create the community of the future, one in which people can live, work and shop all within their own neighborhood, and without getting into their cars. It’s what innovative, visionary urban planners are calling smart growth, and we agree. We can no longer afford to be car-centric. Change must come and it will be painful for some, but you cannot have progress without some discomfort.
Hines is offering to provide affordable and market rate housing that is sorely needed, plus the creative office space to keep us competitive and attracting the high-wage jobs that make our local economy strong. There is a dedication to preservation, child care and green space. The project, if approved, would be built adjacent to public transit in the form of the Exposition Light Rail line. This is what is envisioned in the Land Use & Circulation Element, a planning document that was debated for years by the community, one that protects traditional residential neighborhoods but allows for growth along transit corridors to meet future demand.
Growth has been everything but inevitable in Santa Monica for decades — the population has barely grown in the past half-century compared to the rest of the region. A lot of that is due to lack of development. And how has that worked out? Well, real estate prices are sky high — unless a rental unit is rent controlled — and traffic is widely agreed to be terrible because of people commuting to jobs.
The Daily Press calls for tweaks to the project — mostly more green space — but opines that a better deal or development is unlikely to come along. Whatever happens, I hope something gets built because putting development near transit makes a lot of sense.
LAX expects to spend $3 million to study consolidated rental car facility (Daily News)
The study would look into building a single facility for rental cars at Manchester Square, the old residential neighborhood west of the 405 and north of Century Boulevard. The airport has bought up most of the properties there and is collecting a ticket fee to help pay for a project should it come to pass.
Under the plan expected to be approved Monday, Kansas City, Mo.-based TranSystems Corp. will receive about $3 million to study building the car rental facility. Many other airports, including Phoenix Sky Harbor and Chicago Midway, have centrally located rental buildings, in which many companies share one garage. Eventually, L.A.’s facility likely would be linked to the Central Terminal Area with an automated train. If built, in 20 years it might also be linked via the same automated system to Metro’s Green and LAX/Crenshaw lines.
I suppose the key phrase there is “20 years.” The automated train — i.e. the people mover — would presumably first travel from the terminals to a “Intermodal Transportation Facility” the airport hopes to build where light rail would meet the people mover
. Here’s the airport map showing how it all comes together:
Categories: Transportation Headlines
We don’t need anymore studies. Just get it built and the people will use it.
LAX can Fastrak the terminals to collect fees for the people mover. If 110 freeway can be Fastrak then why not the Airport?
Will LAWA be contributing $ to the realignment of Lincoln Blvd., or will the taxpayers be picking that up by ourselves? I’m not opposed to it, I just want the entity deriving the most benefit from the realignment to pay its fair share. The single-occupant driver isn’t going to think “Hey, I’m glad they realigned Lincoln, driving on the old Lincoln was awful.” The realignment is to the benefit of LAWA and the airlines so they can put in their runway, and not the commuters using the road.
Yikes. How long would it take to get from Terminal 7 to the Rental Car Facility in the Staff Recommended Alternative?
P.S. Compare SFO: http://www.flysfo.com/to-from/rental-cars (note that the map does not show the AirTrain Red Line)
The Arts District stations would be great. This would also make the area much much more attractive considering the Regional Connector will go through the area eventually as well.
By the way, I’ve always wanted a look at the Red/Purple yard. Is there any public area that overlooks them, the way the Blue Line itself overlooks its own yard?
Walk across the 1st Street Bridge!
Editor, The Source
I certainly like the idea of adding stations on the East end of the Red/Purple lines. I like it a lot. And as to third-rail electrification with an at-grade station, well, take Chicago’s CTA Blue or Pink lines out towards Brookfield; they’ve got at-grade third-rail electrification, with passenger stations, even crossing streets at-grade, all over the outlying areas, and they don’t seem to be frying a whole lot of people.
Metro still needs to link the Blue line to the Green line and/or the Expo Line to the Crenshaw/LAX Line. Transfering two to three times to get into LAX would be a determent to many travelers.
Wasting $3 million on more useless studies and it’s going to take another 20 years to build? We needed this train to LAX 20 years ago!