Scoping meetings to begin for second phase of Foothill Extension

The public meetings begin on Wednesday night for a planned segment of the Gold Line that would run from Azusa to Montclair in the San Gabriel Valley. Details are after the jump.

The Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority — an independent agency from Metro — has said it will begin construction of the Pasadena-to-Azusa segment of the line this year. That segment is funded by Measure R, the sales tax increase approved by county voters in 2008. The segment from Azusa to Montclair is listed in the first tier of “strategic unfunded” projects in Metro’s long-range plan

Here is the press release from the Foothill Extension Construction Authority:

Over the next two weeks the Construction Authority and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), as part of the CEQA and NEPA environmental review process, will be hosting public scoping meetings for the Foothill Extension Azusa to Montclair. These meetings are the first step in the process to environmentally clear the Azusa to Montclair project. The public scoping meeting details are:

Wednesday, January 12, 2011- 6 to 8 pm

Ganesha Community Center, Ganesha Park

1575 N. White Ave, Pomona, CA

Wednesday, January 19, 2011- 6 to 8 pm

Oakmont Elementary School

120 W. Green St, Claremont, CA

Thursday, January 13, 2011- 6 to 8 pm

Timothy Daniel Crowther Teen and Family Center

241 W. Dawson Ave, Glendora, CA

Thursday, January 20, 2011- 6 to 8 pm

Ekstrand Elementary School

400 N. Walnut Ave, San Dimas, CA

Each meeting will start with a project presentation, opportunity for Q&A , and then open house format where stakeholders can talk one on one with the project team and provide feedback on the project or scope of the environmental review.

In addition to the public scoping meetings, we will also be hosting an interagency scoping meeting for public agency staff on Thursday, January 13, 2011 from 2 – 4 p.m. at the Timothy Daniel Crowther Teen and Family Center in Glendora.

I encourage you to attend any of these meetings and also review the attached materials, which include the Notice of Intent, corridor map and information boards to be utilized at the meetings. Additional information is provided on our website –

2 replies

  1. I am disabled and I live in Ontario and must take 3 buses to get to Claremont to see my doctor. The 14 mile trip takes me well over 2 hours by bus and can be much longer if buses are not on schedule and a connection is missed. It seems absurd that there is no better route. A train line linking Ontario Airport to the Claremont Metrolink Station would be a Gosend for me and for all of the communters who must drive or bus to work from Ontario.

  2. I can think of 50 places in L.A. that can demonstrate a more compelling need for a new rail line. What a sad misallocation of hundreds of millions of dollars.