The art of transit

photo by Bill Sweeney, via Flickr

We’ve posted some photos of nice, clean and modern subway stations in Los Angeles and elsewhere lately, so I thought it would be fun to post a counterpoint. The photo above was taken in the New York subway. Go ahead and guess the borough and the line — the answer is after the jump.

To submit a photo or photos of something transportation-related, post them to Metro’s Flickr group or email them to The photos we’ve featured can be seen in these galleries on Flickr. Or click on the ‘art of transit’ below.

The photo was taken in the the 7th Avenue station for the B and Q lines in Brooklyn — the station that can be used to access Park Slope and Prospect Park.

Categories: The Art of Transit

Tagged as:

3 replies

  1. Yes the New York Subway is dirty, filled with rats and has a lot of creeps. But guess what, there are 468 stations and has great coverage of the city, and is 24 hours. The LA metro is less than 1/10th the size of that.

  2. The art installed in Metro stations here required 1% of the budget.

    To me, that was a good use of 1%.

    I hope that program is continued on the Gold Line Foothill Extension, Regional Connector and Purple Line Extension.

  3. That looks dirty and it’s probably smelly. However, it probably was a lot less expensive to build/maintain than some of our Taj Mahal stations, which often cost $200 million or more to construct.

    I remember visiting NY for the first time nearly 20 years ago, and noticing stations lit by bare incandescent bulbs. Yes, nothing fancy, but good bang for their buck.

    I am a big fan of Metro Rail, but it does seem to me that Metro could build more with less, if they could build stations a bit smaller and less fancy.