Metro to hold community meeting for Purple Line Extension project on June 6

Here is the news release from Metro:

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) will hold a community meeting to discuss preparation for construction for the first section of the Purple Line Extension on Thursday, June 6, 2013 from 5:30-7:30 p.m at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 5905 Wilshire Boulevard in the fifth floor Terrace Room.

Environmental planning has concluded and approvals have been received, allowing work to move forward toward bringing the Purple Line Extension to the Westside.  Construction of the first section of the subway extension will begin in 2014.  Extending from its current terminus at Wilshire/Western, this section adds three new stations at Wilshire/La Brea, Wilshire/Fairfax and Wilshire/La Cienega.  Continue reading

Reminder: why Election Day matters in Los Angeles if you care about transportation

screen-shot-2013-03-04-at-7-06-53-pm

Click above to find your polling place.

As you may have heard, there’s a runoff Tuesday in Los Angeles to elect the next mayor of the second-largest city in the nation — a city with about 3.8 million inhabitants and some well-known transportation challenges.

I ran the following post on March 4, the day before the primary election in Los Angeles. I’m running it again today as a reminder to vote in tomorrow’s mayoral election between Eric Garcetti and Wendy Greuel because whichever succeeds Antonio Villaraigosa will likely have a hand in many important transportation decisions, including project acceleration, the future of congestion pricing projects, the construction of five rail projects and possible changes in Metro’s fare structure in the future.

Look up your polling place here.

Metro is a county agency and is overseen by a 13 member Board of Directors who serve as the deciders on most significant issues. The Mayor of Los Angeles gets a seat on that board and gets to fill three other seats with his appointees.

A majority of the Metro Board — i.e. seven votes — is required to approve most items. Four of those seven votes are controlled by the Los Angeles mayor. That means that the mayor controls more than half the votes needed to approve items that have impacts across Los Angeles County and the region.

Here are some items that are likely to confront the Metro Board in the next four or so years, meaning they’re items likely to confront the lucky soul (if luck is the right word) who becomes the next mayor of the City of Angels and/or Parking Lots:

•There is the not-so-tiny issue of whether to accelerate the building of Measure R projects and, if so, how best to pay for it and which transit and road projects are included. The next mayor may also choose to use their bully pulpit to persuade Congress to adopt the full America Fast Forward program, which would greatly expand funding for transportation projects.

•Although Metro CEO Art Leahy has already said there will be no changes to Metro’s fares in the upcoming fiscal year that begins July 1, he also said it’s an issue that will likely have to be revisited sooner rather than later in order to help Metro keep up with its expenses.

Continue reading

Transportation headlines, Thursday, May 16

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

Alhambra declares 710 day, reaffirming support for freeway extension (L.A. Times) 

Mark your calendars: the big day will be July 10 to show support for a tunnel that would connect the 710 from its terminus at Valley Boulevard to the 210 freeway in Pasadena. The current connection involves using city streets such as Fremont, Pasadena Avenue and Orange Grove that are also heavily residential. Metro is currently studying a project to help improve traffic in the area; the alternatives include a freeway tunnel, bus rapid transit, light rail, traffic signal and intersection improvements and the obligatory no-build option.

Mayoral candidate scorecard (Crenshaw Subway Coalition) 

The group advocating for a Leimert Park station and the undergrounding of the light rail line in Park Mesa Heights between 48th and 59th issues its grades on where L.A. mayoral candidates Eric Garcetti and Wendy Greuel stand on the two issues. Here is the news release and here are letters from the candidates.

It is worth noting (as the news release does) that it’s still possible that the Metro Board of Directors will select a firm to build the project before the next mayor takes office on July 1; otherwise the decision will be made when the next mayor will be on the Metro Board along with three appointees. Metro is seeking a firm that can build the Leimert Park station within the project’s existing $1.76-billion budget. The Leimert Park station is included in the project’s final environmental study that has been approved by the federal government; the 48th to 59th tunnel is not in the study, meaning the study or a part of it would have to be re-done.

Furthermore, while the candidates have similar views — there is some subtle differences in the language they employ — neither says where the hundreds of millions of dollars would come from to reopen the project’s environmental studies and then build the light rail line underground in Park Mesa Heights.

Portuguese car commercial goes Metro to slam transit riders (LA Streetsblog) 

Hmmm. How shall I spin this? I know–I’ll change the topic and use the video to remind everyone that eating ginormous hamburgers is prohibited on Metro trains and buses! Thank you for your cooperation and helping to keep our local transit system clean and tidy!

Want a subway extension? Here’s what you can look forward to! (LAObserved) 

The recent news that bids came in high to build stations for San Francisco’s Central Subway project lights the fuse at LAObserved with Mark Lacter predicting it’s inevitable to happen here with the Purple Line Extension. Lacter cites a 2003 study that found that rail projects around the world often go over budget.

Rep. Howard ‘Buck’ McKeon authors letter supporting Metro New Starts projects

130508_New_Starts_Letter_to_Appropriations_McKeon

The federal New Starts program helps local transit agencies build large and high impact transit projects; Metro is seeking $2 billion of New Starts money to help fund the Purple Line Extension and the Regional Connector.

The letter from Rep. McKeon (R-Santa Clarita) is very helpful, given the uncertainty of transportation funding in Congress these days. The 25th district that McKeon represents includes Santa Clarita, Palmdale, Lancaster and parts of eastern Ventura County.

Digging to begin in few weeks for exploratory shaft for Purple Line Extension project

Photo by Metro.

Photo by Metro.

Activity continues to ramp up on the southwest corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Ogden Drive, where Metro will soon be digging an exploratory shaft for the Purple Line Extension project. The site is located directly opposite LACMA, as the above photo shows.

Metro took possession of the site on April 1 and is prepping the area and bringing in equipment in order to begin drilling around June 1. The shaft will be approximately 40 feet by 20 feet and 75 feet deep.  Once drilling begins, it should take about six months to reach that depth with work occurring between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. from Monday through Friday.

The exploratory shaft will be used to gather more data about geologic and soil conditions in the area. The first phase of the subway project will run for 3.9 miles from the current Wilshire/Western station to Wilshire/La Cienega.

The current schedule has tunneling beginning in 2015 with the segment opening to the public in late 2022. The project is funded by the Measure R sales tax increase approved by L.A. County voters in 2008 and is seeking matching funds from the federal government’s New Starts program that helps local transit agencies build large and pricey projects.

Related Source posts: 

President Obama’s budget calls for $130 million for two Metro projects: Purple Line Extension and Regional Connector 

Westside Subway Extension gets a new official name: Purple Line Extension

This photo explains why Metro is building the Westside/Purple Line Extension

President Obama’s proposed budget calls for $130 million for two Metro projects: Purple Line Extension and Regional Connector

This page from the U.S. Dept. of Transportation booklet of budget highlights. Click above for the full document (pdf).

This page from the U.S. Dept. of Transportation booklet of budget highlights. Click above for the full document (pdf).

Some very welcome news via the proposed budget released today by President Barack Obama: the budget includes $130 million to help fund two of Metro’s big rail projects: the Purple Line Extension and the Regional Connector. The budget allocates $65 million to both projects.

This is the first time that both projects will actually receive federal money. The funds are extremely significant because they help supplement Measure R funds for two projects that are both very expensive and need additional funds. Although Congress still must approve the budget, historically these type of funds don’t change much during budget negotiations.

There’s another reason the money is important. The funds are the first payment for more federal dollars that will flow to both projects in future federal budgets via the federal New Starts program that helps local transit agencies pay for big, pricey transit improvements — such as new rail lines.

Formal agreements that detail the New Starts money are expected to be signed between Metro and the Federal Transit Administration later this year. The subway will be asking for $2.3 billion in New Starts money and has a budget of $2.4 billion for its first phase to La Cienega Boulevard. The Regional Connector will be asking for $671 million in New Starts money and has a budget of $1.3 billion.

Continue reading

Board agrees on contract modification for further engineering work for Westside/Purple Line Extension

The Metro Board approved on a 7 to 2 vote a contract modification worth about $30.5 million dollars for Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., to provide preliminary engineering services and other work on the first and second phases of the Westside/Purple Line Extension, as well as final design services for modifications to the Division 20 subway rail car maintenance yard.

The modification brings the contract total for Parsons Brinckherhoff, Inc. to $120.6 million. The first phase of the project will extend the subway from Wilshire/Western to Wilshire/La Cienega and the second phase to Constellation and Avenue of the Stars in Century City.

Board Members Don Knabe and John Fasana voted against the modification, saying that spending money on the subway extension's second phase at this point was not consistent with construction timelines listed in Metro's long-range plan.

Click here for a Metro staff report (pdf).

 

Transportation headlines, Monday, Jan. 7

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

ART OF TRANSIT: An eastbound 20 bus passes by MacArthur Park on Friday afternoon. Photo by Steve Hymon/Metro.

ART OF TRANSIT: A westbound 20 bus on Wilshire Boulevard passes MacArthur Park Lake on Friday afternoon. Photo by Steve Hymon/Metro.

Mayoral candidates split on Westside Subway route (Daily News) 

Here’s the first sentence of the story: “In a mostly amicable race so far, one of the first issues to divide the leading candidates for Los Angeles mayor involves another city altogether – Beverly Hills.”

The story is a followup to last Thursday’s mayoral debate at a Beverly Hills synagogue, in which candidates briefly discussed their views on the Westside/Purple Line Subway Extension and whether the route should go under the Beverly Hills High School campus  on its way to a station in Century City at Constellation and Avenue of the Stars.

For those keeping score at home, Eric Garcetti said on Thursday it should  go under the High School which would put the Century City station at Constellation and Avenue of the Stars. In the article in the Daily News, Wendy Greuel clarified that she supports Metro’s decision to route the subway under the campus  to the Constellation Station location. Kevin James has called for alternative routes for the subway while Emmanuel Pleitez criticized these sorts of projects as “grandiose.”

Jan Perry said the subway should not go under Beverly Hills High because there are oil fields and instability at the campus. Excerpt:

Perry’s decision to oppose the tunnel came after attending Metro meetings and reading documents related to the project, she said in an interview Saturday.

She said her position wasn’t influenced by her longtime friendship with Lisa Korbatov, who sits on the five-member Beverly Hills Unified School District Board of Education, and is a vocal opponent of the route.

Korbatov helped throw a fundraiser for Perry in 2011, and was scheduled to help throw another one over the recent holiday period, an event canceled because of scheduling issues. Korbatov has been quoted in Perry’s campaign literature, saying Perry has the “kind of independence and leadership” needed by the mayor of Los Angeles.

Korbatov’s parents helped establish the garment district in downtown Los Angeles, and the family is longtime supporters of Perry, who represents parts of downtown. Lisa Korbatov and her family members have contributed at least $4,700 to Perry’s mayoral campaign, according to the City Ethics Commission.

Asked about her ties to Lisa Korbatov, Perry replied: “I make my own decisions, I don’t make them based on friendships. I talk to a lot of people.” Korbatov also dismissed any notion Perry made her decision based on the two women’s friendship.

The Metro Board of Directors in May selected an alignment for the subway last May when they voted to certify the project’s Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report; the Board chose the alignment under the campus because of safety concerns over locating the tunnels and station under Santa Monica Boulevard along active earthquake fault zones. The Federal Transit Administration issued their “Record of Decision” approving the FEIS/R also last year. Utility relocation work on the  first section of the  subway project has begun.

In order to change the route, Metro would have to re-open the environmental study phase of the project, the Metro Board of Directors would have to approve of the new studies and the FTA would be required to issue a new Record of Decision. The project could be delayed as a result.

Colorado Boulevard Bridge work begins in Arcadia for Gold Line Foothill Extension (Arcadia Patch) 

A short stretch of Colorado Boulevard just west of Santa Anita Avenue will be closed for the next three months as work ramps up to replace and widen the bridge carrying tracks over the street. The work is part of the project that is extending the Gold Line for 11.5 miles from eastern Pasadena to the Azusa/Glendora border — look for a lot more construction work along the entire alignment in the coming months.

Santa Monica Council weighs names for Expo Line stations (Santa Monica City Council agenda) 

The Council wants its three stations named “Downtown Santa Monica,” “Colorado/17th Street/SMC” and “26th Street/Bergamot.” This differs from the more generic names currently being used by the Expo Line Construction Authority, the independent agency building the second phase of the Expo Line. Station names are ultimately the decision of the Metro Board of Directors. In this case, the “SMC” — as in Santa Monica City College” — is interesting because the closest part of the campus is about .6 miles from the Expo Line station at 17th and Colorado.

$3-billion road repair bond proposed for Los Angeles (L.A. Times)

Two members of the Los Angeles City Council — Mitchell Englander and Joe Buscaino — have proposed asking voters to consider a property tax increase on the May 21 ballot that would raise three billion dollars to repair streets in the city. The proposed tax increase would initially raise property taxes by $24 on a home valued at $350,000 with that increase rising to $120 in the peak year of the bond. I know many readers on The Source do not live in Los Angeles, but many of you ride buses that get a good bounce or two (or more) while traveling along Los Angeles streets.

No more free meters on Sundays in San Francisco (San Francisco Chronicle)

The tradition of free meters dates back to 1947 but it’s all over now. The move is intended to raise money for mass transit, perhaps nudge more riders to transit and help local businesses that need more parking turnover to lure customers.

Transportation headlines, Friday, Jan. 4

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

ART OF TRANSIT: Kawaguchiko Station in Japan with Mt. Fuji in the background. Photo by Les Taylor, via Flickr creative commons.

ART OF TRANSIT: Kawaguchiko Station in Japan with Mt. Fuji in the background. Photo by Les Taylor, via Flickr creative commons.

Los Angeles Mayor candidates talk transportation (KPCC)

There are few specifics from a candidate forum held Thursday night at a Beverly Hills synagogue. The article notes that Councilman Eric Garcetti was the only candidate who outright supported tunneling under the Beverly Hills High School campus for the Purple Line Extension.

There are more details in L.A. Weekly, which reports that Controller Wendy Greuel didn’t take a position — only saying there should be a station in Century City — while Councilwoman Jan Perry said that she didn’t believe the tunnel should go under the school. Kevin James also criticized the planned subway route and Emmanuel Pleitez criticized large rail projects in general, reports the Weekly.

Hey, I just found video of the debate at the Jewish Journal website. The discussion on transportation begins at the one hour, 14-minute mark.

Subway deaths haunt those at the trains’ controls (New York Times) 

Powerful story on how train operators cope — or try to — after accidents in which subway trains strike people who commit suicide or somehow fall on the track. Such accidents occur on a far more frequent basis in New York than elsewhere, perhaps because of the sheer size of the system and its high ridership.

BART labors to keep escalators running (San Francisco Chronicle) 

At one point this past summer, 28 of the agency’s 179 escalators were out of service — called the ‘dark days’ by BART staff. All transit agencies struggle to keep escalators (filled with hundreds of parts) working and BART is now considering canopies to help protect some escalators from the elements. Sounds familiar!

Transportation headlines, Friday, Nov. 30

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

Quality of life and visitor experience: public transportation and pedestrian-friendliness (Travel and Leisure)

Based on a reader survey, the magazine says Los Angeles 29th out of 35 major cities on a vote by residents while visitors scored L.A. as No. 32. Not to sound too much like a spinmeister, but I’m guessing transit in Los Angeles scored better than local sidewalk scene, which is very lacking in many parts of town. It probably didn’t help that there is no rail connections yet to Santa Monica or Disneyland, two parts of the Southland that attract a lot of tourists.

Yaroslavsky criticizes Board’s use of money, Courier’s publisher (Beverly Hills Weekly, pdf, please see page 2)

Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky spoke to the Beverly Hills Rotary Club earlier this week and didn’t mince words — in other words, he was refreshingly himself, as usual — about the dispute with Metro over the route of the Purple Line Extension. Yaroslavsky, in particular, took aim at the Beverly Hills Unified School Board’s decision to keep spending money on lawsuits against Metro while it considers asking voters next spring to approve a parcel tax to help erase a budget deficit.

Yaroslavsky’s main point is that even if the lawsuits succeed, a victory would only ensure that Metro has to re-do parts of its environmental studies on the subway project. A court victory does not mean that Metro has to change the subway’s route and it remains unlikely the Metro Board would choose to do that given there is no credible scientific evidence that it’s safe to build a station under Santa Monica Boulevard, nor is there any evidence that it’s unsafe to tunnel under any parts of the Beverly Hills High School campus.

Yaroslavsky also criticized the Courier for attacking Beverly Hills Mayor Willie Brien for attending the groundbreaking event for the beginning of utility relocation of the subway’s first segment, which ends at La Cienega Boulevard, far from Century City. The Courier has used its news and editorial pages — the two are often indistinguishable — to fight the subway route and support/promote local politicians who agree with the newspaper.

Mobile ticketing expands in the Boston area (BostInno)

A new app allows commuter train riders to buy a ticket on their smartphone. Conductors on the train are trained to check tickets on a phone, saving the local transit agency the hassle of printing and dealing with paper tickets. The app is nicely designed and easy to use.

Dissent of the week: praise for NYC’s BRT (Human Transit)

Using New York City’s new bus rapid transit routes as an example, transit planner Jarrett Walker encourages transit agencies and their planners to aim high and seek serious improvements in travel times — not just slight improvements over already embarrassing travel times. Excerpt:

For example, in the original Seattle Transit Plan that I worked on in 2005, we asked not “what interventions can we make to speed up those buses a bit?” but rather “how fast (and frequent) do the buses have to be to deliver the scale of mode shift that is essential to what Seattle wants to be as a city?”  San Francisco’s Transit Effectiveness Project is a similar model.   Get influential policy people thinking about the second question, and the battlefield changes, because now each struggle to remove a parking space is part of a citywide or regionwide sustainability mission.

Boy, I’d love to hear local transit planners be more explicit about this and say something like “If we’re trying to get Jane Smith our of her car, which she can take directly from her driveway to a free parking spot near her desk, we probably need to build something that travels at X speed and runs X frequently and that will come at a great expense: X amount of dollars.