Summary of public comments on Union Station Master Plan draft alternatives

The above is a summary of the 44 public comments received after the community meeting earlier this month on the draft alternatives for the Los Angeles Union Station Master Plan. Please scroll to page three to see a breakdown of the comments. Comments run the gamut from the need for more restrooms in the station to concerns about cost.

The plan is seeking to improve Union Station for decades to come by making transit access easier and better using space at the facility. In addition, the plan is also trying to identify the best place to accommodate the high-speed rail project that is planned to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Here is an earlier post on the draft alternatives, as well as a Q&A on the ongoing plan process. This post from April features a few dozen photos of the station both in its current form and some historic pics. And here are a pair of videos of meeting attendees commenting on the draft alternatives.

Transportation headlines, Thursday, May 9

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

Delays, costs build up for 405 project (L.A. Times) 

A good look at the various issues that have delayed completion of the project that is adding a northbound carpool lane to the 405 between the 10 and 101 as well as widening bridges and rebuilding the on- and off-ramps to/from Wilshire Boulevard. Excerpt:

The 405 project is being built under a speedier-than-typical process. State lawmakers fast-tracked the construction by choosing the so-called “design-build” method over the more traditional “design-bid-build.”

Design-build puts a single contractor in charge of final design and construction, in theory enabling projects to run more smoothly and to be completed at lower cost.

Shaving years off the project “saves hundreds of millions of dollars in construction impacts, costs and travel delays for the public,” said Dave Sotero, a Metro spokesman.

But there can be downsides to this approach.

Some tasks that normally would be completed before the bulldozers and pile drivers move in — such as relocating utility lines — must be completed while construction is underway. Nasty surprises can derail plans.

In addition to the utility relocations, other problems have involved retaining walls and securing a property easement to build ramps from Getty Center Drive. The project is scheduled to be completed by mid-2014 with some parts of it opening prior. That’s a year behind the original schedule but seven years ahead of the 2021 completion date if design-build had not been used.

Crenshaw Subway Coalition gets ready for Leimert Park station showdown (Los Angeles Wave) 

A rendering from the Crenshaw/LAX Line's final environmental document showing the light rail running at grade between 48th and 59th.

A rendering from the Crenshaw/LAX Line’s final environmental document showing the light rail running at grade between 48th and 59th.

An update on a recent community meeting by the group fighting to add a Leimert Park station to the Crenshaw/LAX Line and have the segment between 48th and 59th streets put underground (as approved it will be built at street level). The article also included the Coalition’s update on what the Los Angeles mayoral candidates have written to the Coalition. Excerpt:

“As soon as possible upon taking office as mayor [I commit to directing] staff to review the design options in the [Environmental Impact Report/Statement] as well as funding opportunities for underground portions of Crenshaw Blvd between 48th and 59th streets,” Greuel wrote.

Meanwhile, Garceti declared: “As mayor, I will continue to aggressively fight for the rail stop in Leimert Park to improve safety, create jobs, boost local businesses and provide better access to a transportation option that will help South L.A. residents get where they need to go without a car, which will reduce congestion and pollution for us all.”

Bids to build the project are scheduled to be released soon by Metro, as well as a Metro staff recommendation for who should be awarded the contract. At this point, the earliest the Board would consider that contract is in late June; Garcetti or Greuel will take office on July 1. The Board has already approved adding a Leimert Park station if it could be built within the project’s budget. Putting the segment south of 48th Street underground is a bigger deal because that’s not the project approved that was approved by the Board or put out to bid, nor was it the project approved by the Federal Transit Administration in late 2011. Stay tuned!

L.A. Council approves controversial rail yard for port complex (L.A. Times) 

Cargo ships on the Panama Canal in a 2008 photo. Credit: ThinkPanama, via Flickr creative commons.

Cargo ships on the Panama Canal in a 2008 photo. Credit: ThinkPanama, via Flickr creative commons.

The 153-acre facility in Wilmington would allow more cargo containers to be transfered from trucks to Burlington Northern Santa Fe trains closer to the ports. Proponents say it would vastly reduce truck trips on the nearby 710 freeway and that it will be the greenest facility of its kind. Opponents counter that the yard will spew more pollution into the area and have threatened to sue. Looming over the entire issue is the widening of the Panama Canal, which may or may not (depending on who is doing the predicting) inspire the largest cargo ships from Asia to bypass the West Coast and instead unload at harbors along the Gulf of Mexico and the East Coast.

Has high-speed rail been derailed? (Governing) 

A good, balanced article on federal funding of President Obama’s initiative to build high-speed rail lines around the U.S. As the article notes, the $42 billion needed from the feds to build a San Francisco-to-Los Angeles line seems unlikely to come from the current Congress given recent budget cuts. But proponents point to smaller projects around the country that are speeding up existing Amtrak lines and say high-speed rail is much like the interstate highway system — it will be done in increments.

Transportation headlines, Friday, May 3: Is California bike friendly? When death rode the rails, Boston transit seeks security, HSR defends bidding process

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

Photo by Cyclotourist via Flickr

Photo by Cyclotourist via Flickr

Are we bike friendly? This ranking says, ‘Not so much’ (League of American Bicyclists)

Bike Month is here with Bike Week L.A. coming up fast, May 13-19, and Bike to Work Day May 16. That’s the day bicyclists ride free on Metro. With all that going on locally it seems a little weird that the League of American Bicyclists has released its annual ranking of bike-friendly states and that California is ranked number 19. Washington tops the list, of course. But at least locally, it seems like we’re making terrific efforts to encourage bike riding and to help keep bicyclists safe. Anyway, check out the list and see if you’re not inspired with the progress our nation is making re-embracing a form of transit that has absolutely no down side.

Boston Transit takes steps to boost safety and security (Boston Globe)

MBTA is taking steps to beef up its security systems. They’re not the only ones. Transit agencies across the country are on heightened alert but it’s vitally important that L.A. riders keep an eye out for suspicious activity and report it by calling (888) 950-SAFE (7233).

HSR defends bidding criteria (Los Angeles Times)

The California High-Speed Rail authority defends its bidding criteria against critics who say recent changes could jeopardize project quality.

When death rode the American rails (The Atlantic: Cities)

Who knew? In certain parts of the country, including the Los Angeles area, dedicated funeral cars were added to the streetcar systems. The only one that survives relatively intact is the Descanso (Spanish for “rest”), currently on display at the Orange Empire Railway Museum in Perris, California.

Colorado Boulevard in Arcadia closed for three more weeks (Pasadena Star-News)

So that bridge work can continue on the Gold Line Foothill Extension. Avoid the area, as they say.

Draft alternatives released for Los Angeles Union Station Master Plan

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

Click to view larger.

The Los Angeles Union Station Master Plan team is releasing its draft alternatives today for improving the venerable station as a transit center. Among some of the proposals (shown above) are replacing the parking lots in front of the station with open space, building a new bus terminal to handle most of the considerable bus traffic at the station and possibly replacing the current transit plaza at the rear of the station with other structures and/or green space.

While all the alternatives will work without high-speed rail, they each offer a variety of ways that high-speed rail could access the station, including configurations in which the tracks are above the current platform, below grade at both the east and west of the current Union Station and running through the current city of Los Angeles Piper Tech facility.

All four of the alternatives and much more will be discussed by Metro officials at a community meeting Thursday (May 2) from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo at the intersection of Central and 1st streets. The meeting will be live streamed at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/lausmp and will be recorded for later viewing.

Here’s a Q&A I put together on today’s news that covers the basics.

What do all the alternatives have in common?

That the historic Los Angeles Union Station built in 1939 is preserved and remains at the center of transit operations. The idea is to embellish the station so that it works as the region’s transit hub for many decades to come while better connecting it to the surrounding neighborhoods — i.e. Chinatown, Little Tokyo, the Arts District, the Civic Center and Boyle Heights.  While the details are not developed yet at this stage, all of the alternatives will create improved pedestrian and bike pathways, including a bike lane through the site.

Union Station is already serving about 10 times the number of people it did after opening in 1939. The expansion of Metro Rail, increased bus service and plans for high-speed rail make it extremely likely that Union Station will only get more crowded if nothing is done.

Do the alternatives propose building designs?

No, that comes later. The alternatives released today are concepts about where to put facilities and future development on the 47 acres of land (and in some cases beyond that) that Metro owns.

Of course, the design of any future buildings, open space and bike and pedestrian connections matter a lot — the devil is always in the details. At this point of the master plan process, however, Metro is first trying to determine where to put everything transit-related. In its current configuration, bus and rail operations at Union Station are widely dispersed. For example, there are five different locations where local and regional buses stop, leading to some confusion among riders and a lot of walking.

Continue reading

Transportation headlines, Thursday, April 18: L.A. air quality improving, roadway air pollution migrates, HSR plan fan no more

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

 

Photo by fksr/flickr

Photo by fksr/flickr

Air quality across Southern California better … but challenges remain (Los Angeles Daily News)

The 2012 peak ozone concentrations in our region were the lowest ever measured in the South Coast Air Basin, according to a new report, which further states that in 2000, there were 30 unhealthy days in Los Angeles County versus 11 in 2012. And yet the South Coast Air Quality Management District is (prudently) requesting tougher restrictions on wood burning in open pits and fireplaces as well as cleaner ports and railroads, including emission-reduction strategies such as encouraging the replacement and/or retrofitting of older diesel trucks and buses. Metro, as we like to repeat as frequently as possible, runs only clean-burning CNG buses.

And … freeway air pollution travels farther in early morning (Los Angeles Times)

This study shows that heavily trafficked roadways have a large impact on downwind populations.

One man’s journey from L.A. to Real Madrid (Sports Illustrated)

Here’s a story about following your heart that has nothing to do with transportation, except that the main character is a Metro employee. The piece, originally published in Sports Illustrated but posted this morning on LA Observed, tells us how Metro employee Abel Rodriguez, obviously a major soccer fan, flew to Spain to see a match between Madrid and Barcelona – without a ticket or a place to stay — and ended up the guest of Real Madrid coach Jose Mourinho. It’s a lot of fun and it will make you feel good.

No longer on board the bullet train (Los Angeles Times)

Interesting interview with Quentin Kopp — one-time head of the California High-Speed Rail Authority — in which he criticizes the current version of HSR and talks about why he thinks we ought to kill it. Among his observations is something many Southern Californians would buy: the Central Valley is not the best place to start. The best place would be by building L.A. to San Diego first.

Union Station past and present, in photographs

Over the last couple of weeks I’ve been both shooting and collecting photos of Los Angeles Union Station, the best of which I’ve put in the above slideshow; click on the first image to begin the slideshow. You can also watch the slideshow on The Source’s Flickr page or as a video on YouTube.

For those interested in the old ticket room and Harvey House, there are a bunch of photos about halfway through the slideshow. After years of looking through Harvey House through the windows, I finally had a chance to go inside. It’s spectacular.

Some quick background: Metro purchased Union Station for roughly $70 million from Catellus in 2011. The purchase gave Metro direct control over Southern California’s largest rail and bus hub, including  development rights on 40 acres of land. Buying Union Station also prevented the facility from being tied up in a real estate trust that would have kept a very public space in private hands well into the future.

In 2012, Metro hired Gruen Associates in association with Grimshaw Architects of London to develop a master plan for the facility. In March, both a Metro staff report and PowerPoint were released that explained the early findings of the Master Plan process: making Union Station work as a transit hub will be the top priority. I tried to take some of the photos to reflect issues raised thus far by the Master Plan team.

The Master Plan process is important considering the Metro Rail system will be growing in the next three decades because of funding supplied by the Measure R sales tax approved by L.A. County voters in 2008. The California high-speed rail project is slated to arrive at Union Station when funding for that segment is secured. Bottom line: an already busy facility is going to be a lot busier. Here’s the Master Plan home page on metro.net.

Transportation headlines, Monday, April 8

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

DSC_0111

ART OF TRANSIT: A Gold Line train passes over Alameda Street in downtown L.A. on Friday. The photo was taken from the City Hall observatory deck. Photo by Steve Hymon/Metro.

Houston rising — why the next great American cities aren’t what you think (Daily Beast) 

Here is an article intended to provoke. Drawing on a variety of stats, Los Angeles-based writer Joel Kotkin argues that the fastest growing cities in the U.S. in recent years are also the kind of car-centric, sprawling suburban-dominated places that are often ridiculed in urban planning circles. Among those: Raleigh, Austin, Houston, San Antonio, Las Vegas, Orlando, Dallas-Fort Worth, Charlotte and Phoenix.

Excerpt:

One common article of faith among mainstream urbanists, at least when they stop to note this growth at all, is that these cities grow mainly because they are cheap and can house the unskilled. But in reality many of these metropolitan areas are also leading the nation in growing their number of well-educated arrivals. Houston, Charlotte, Raleigh, Las Vegas, Nashville, and San Antonio, for example, experienced increases in the number of college-educated residents of nearly 40 percent or more over the decade, roughly twice the level of growth as in “brain centers” such as Boston, San Francisco, San Jose (Silicon Valley), or Chicago. Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas each have added about 300,000 college grads in the past decade, more than greater Boston’s pickup of 240,000 or San Francisco’s 211,000.

Kotkin frequently writes about density and urban planning. He has certainly needled attempts to make L.A. more dense and transit friendly, authoring a 2007 op-ed in the L.A. Times alleging that Los Angeles is turning into Manhattan. That’s of course a ludicrous thing to say — and usually only said by people who have either never been to New York or Los Angeles or believe that their readers can’t tell a tall building from a short one (L.A.’s most dense sections are less than half as dense as Manhattan’s densest sections).

That said, I think this new article is super, uber-interesting. Kotkin is on to something: The car-centric cities of the middle of America are still very popular. And they’re changing, with old neighborhoods being revived and, in some cases, downtowns being rediscovered and new park systems being built. And, of course, many are investing heavily in transit and light rail (an effort dismissed by Kotkin as “quixotic”), a list that inclues Phoenix, Houston, Charlotte, Dallas and Orlando.

What does all this have to do with Los Angeles? That’s a great question. L.A. in some ways competes with other cities and states for jobs, economic opportunities, businesses, new residents, scholars, etc. So that’s important for our local leaders and residents to keep in mind — no one wants to be Detroit, although I don’t think L.A. is remotely close to that. More importantly, perhaps, I think it points to a broader trend: America is becoming an urban nation and even some of the most dreadful cities are coming back. If the majority of Americans are going to live in cities, then perhaps it’s time for Congress to recognize that fact and start investing in those places.

Azusa gets $650,000 grant from Metro to plan for transit-oriented development (San Gabriel Valley Tribune) 

Azusa will be home to two Gold Line Foothill Extension stations — one in downtown Azusa and the other just north of Citrus College. The grant from Metro will help the city plan transit-oriented developments and re-work its zoning code to permit more density near the stations. There is certainly room in downtown Azusa and I think the first, easy move that Azusa officials can make is an easy one: call officials from nearby Claremont, who have done a splendiferous job revitalizing their downtown.

High-speed rail a highlight of Brown’s China trip (Sacramento Bee)

Gov. Jerry Brown is visiting China and will be checking out China’s vast and relatively new (and highly government subsidized) high-speed rail system. With California’s bullet train still many billions of dollars shy of the funding it needs to complete a San Francisco-to-Los Angeles leg, Gov. Brown will also be inquiring about Chinese interest in investing in the California project.

Transportation headlines, Wednesday, March 27

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

Metro Transportation Library and Archive a ‘mover and shaker!’ (Library Journal) 

A very nice nod to Metro librarian Kenn Bicknell for his work in developing the Metro library. Excerpt:

He has made the Metro Transportation Library a leader in deploying online tools and technology to bring library resources to users, says Matthew Barrett, Archives and Records Management administrator for the county Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Bicknell’s work at Metro has raised the library’s national profile and serves as a model for other small libraries and other cultural institutions in the Los Angeles region, Barrett says. [snip]

Use of the library’s online resources has exploded, in part because voters in 2008 approved a $40 billion upgrade to L.A. transit systems. Online access of the library’s collection grew exponentially, from 140,400 page views in FY07 to 4.3 million in FY11 (the latest available figures). “The numbers are so fast and so big, we know we’re doing something right,” Bicknell says.

The number of subscribers to Bicknell’s five-day-a-week blog digest with links to news on transportation and urban planning issues has grown more than 50 percent from 93,171 in FY09 to 140,993 in FY11. “It’s rewarding to feel like you’re driving the water cooler conversation,” Bicknell says.

Well said. My three cents: it’s pretty difficult to plan a future without some understanding of  the past. Many of the transit and road projects pursued by Metro have a long, rich history and the library has done an outstanding job of preserving it.

Los Angeles loses in first round of ‘Parking Madness’ tournament (D.C. Streetsblog)

In a stunning upset, downtown Los Angeles was ousted by downtown Dallas in the first round of the Streetsblog tournament to determine which American city has the most sprawling parking lots. The tournament began with 16 cities and so far Tulsa and Milwaukee have also advanced to the Elite Eight. Louisville holds a comfortable lead over San Diego in yesterday’s park-off and Cleveland versus Spokane was just posted. Go Cleveland!

How the Highland Park Transit Village will look from the street (Patch) 

The developers of an 80-unit building to be constructed on three city of Los Angeles parking lots in Highland Park brought some video renderings to a neighborhood council to persuade members that their project won’t be unsightly or overwhelm downtown Highland Park. I think it will be good for the area — businesses need residents to survive and thrive and it makes a lot of sense to build near transit. The parking lots are a stone’s throw from the Gold Line’s Highland Park station; it’s a 15-minute ride from there to Union Station.

High-speed rail’s strongest backers now express reservations (L.A. Times)

First, headline is a little misleading: as the story makes clear, there are other ‘strong’ backers of the project who don’t have reservations. Nonetheless, some project proponents have taken issue with the so-called ‘blended’ approach that would allow bullet trains to share tracks with commuter trains in Northern California. The concern is that will prevent trains from traveling between Los Angeles and San Francisco in the state-mandated two hours, 40 minutes and that slower trains will need to be subsidized because they can’t compete with airlines.

Of course, there are probably many motorists and people who take planes who would be more than happy to take a train between the Bay Area and Los Angeles in five hours or so — instead of the 10- to 12-hour journey now required on Amtrak (when trains are on schedule). But the state Legislature chose to pursue the fast, most expensive option for high-speed rail, leading to the kind of controversies described in the preceding paragraph.

Transportation headlines, Friday, March 22: New CicLAvia route, bullet train to Bakersfield, car commuters and weight gain

Here is a look at some of the transportation headlines gathered by us and the Metro Library. The full list of headlines is posted on the Library’s Headlines blog, which you can also access via email subscription or RSS feed.

CivLAvia map for April 21 celebration.

CivLAvia map for April 21 celebration.

CicLAvia updates map for April 21 … no Figueroa, but MacArthur Park is back (StreetsBlog LA)

No rush but sometime before April 21, make sure you check out the new CicLAvia route, which is heading straight down Main Street, with a right onto 7th. (Take the Metro Red,  Purple or Gold Line to Union Station.) And even if you don’t ride, join the celebration of L.A.’s beautiful and diverse neighborhoods.

Can the bullet train provide a needed boost for second-tier cities? (The Atlantic: Cities)

Everyone has an opinion on high speed rail in California. Generally it’s about money, or lack of, but the plan to start building in the Central Valley also has proved irksome to city dwellers who think — rightly or wrongly — that cities are the economic centers and really ought to get the train before the outlanders do. But are cities the best place to start?  Here’s an argument for a second-tier city starting line. What do you think?   

San Francisco set to push transit benefits for commuters (San Francisco Examiner)  

This has been on the books for several years but it looks like there’s new interest in enforcing it. Under San Francisco’s Commuter Benefits Ordinance, all businesses with 20 or more workers nationwide must offer one of three transit benefits: The pretax deduction, up to $245 per month, for transit or vanpool expenses; transit subsidies valued at $74, the cost of a monthly Muni pass, or a vanpool from a worker’s home to the place of business. Businesses with fewer than 20 employees are exempt. No such law here but Metro has a variety of voluntary employer-sponsored transit passes and programs that make commuting easier and save employers and employees money. Worth checking out.   

Study says car commuters put on more weight than active commuters (Streetsblog DC)

Thought for the weekend: Going to the gym may not be enough to keep pounds off if we drive to work, says a new study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. The study specifically measured commuters who bike or walk to work or to transit and that, of course, is a real calorie spender. But even for those of us who walk a block or so from our cars to public transit, it’s calories spent and muscles moved. Another kind of mobility that adds up to better health for us … and for our air quality.

Mixed news on transportation funding from Congress — not exactly a shocker, people

For masochistic readers following the tortuous path of transportation funding in Congress, here are a dynamic duo of legislative updates from Metro’s government relations staff.

The first is good news: the House of Representatives restored transportation funding in the budget for the second half of this fiscal year.

The second is not so good news: the House of Representatives is hacking away at transportation funding in a budget they’re preparing for the next fiscal year.

The updates:

House Adopts Six Month Stop Gap Spending Bill

This morning, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Senate-amended version of H.R. 933, a six month stop gap funding bill for the Federal Government for the balance of Federal Fiscal Year 2013.

The bill was adopted by a vote of 318 to 109. As was shared in yesterday’s Legislative Alert, the U.S. Senate passed this bill last night by a vote of 73 to 26. In a welcome development, the bill includes language that aligns the level of funding for federal transportation programs with the amounts authorized for those programs under the newly adopted surface transportation bill, MAP-21.

Under the previous stop gap funding bill that covered the first six months of Federal Fiscal Year 2013, Congress ignored MAP-21 funding levels and kept the funding for federal transportation programs at the lower level provided in Federal Fiscal Year 2012.

Initial estimates of this change in policy indicate that federal transportation programs will receive a boost of $385 million dollars of regular discretionary budget authority for the balance of Federal Fiscal Year 2013. This stop gap funding bill is subject to sequestration, which will cut funding across the board for a number of defense and domestic discretionary programs.

Continue reading