Art of Transit:
Things to read whilst transiting: “How George Lucas spliced together Westerns, jidaigeki, space adventure serials, fairy tales, dogfighting movies, and Casablanca to create Hollywood’s first world-conquering collage,” in Slate. By “spliced” they really mean lifted ideas, scenes, particular shots and dialogue from earlier films.
Related 1: I saw “Force Awakens” last night. In the spirit of keeping one’s piehole clamped tightly shut about spoilers, I will only say that I’m already looking forward to Episode VIII on Memorial Day weekend in 2017.
Related 2: my colleague Joe has posted a good list of movie theaters near the Metro Rail system.
Related 3: Imagine how good the prequels could have been if Lucas had cared enough to bring in skilled screenwriters and directors. Sigh.
Oh, and some transpo news…
Santa Monica will add fencing along Expo Line (Santa Monica Lookout)
The story is about a portion of the street-running segment along Colorado Avenue. After initially not wanting the fencing, the SaMo City Council has reversed course and decided to install fencing between the tracks to prevent people from crossing the tracks outside of crosswalks. This is similar to fencing found on the Gold Line and first segment of the Expo Line:
Silver Line from San Pedro to downtown L.A. (Joe Buscaino Facebook page)
Good video of the L.A. Councilmember who represents the ‘Pedro taking the new Silver Line extension to work. Lots of good comments and a cameo from Metro’s Scott Page, who works in bus planning and scheduling.
Here’s our recent post on the new Silver Line service, which began Dec. 13 as part of Metro’s biannual service changes. There are plenty of customer comments on our page, too. And here’s the map:
Mixed-use development to replace DTLA car wash (Urbanize LA)
Thank goodness; the corner of Olympic and Figueroa is not the right place for a car wash, parking lot or other car-centric use. Sounds like a big building will be sought, featuring “feature 374 residential units, a 373-key hotel, nearly 33,5000 square feet of commercial office space, an approximately 10,800-square-foot conference center and over 65,000 square feet of commercial space,” according to Urbanize.
The new building would be a short walk from the Metro Rail hub at 7th/Metro, the Blue and Expo Lines’ Pico Station, the Silver Line and numerous other buses operated by Metro and other muni agencies.
There was understandably lots of news coverage of the Chargers and Rams both possibly playing their last games in San Diego and St. Louis this past weekend. This LAT story is older but looks at a key question: where exactly will the Chargers, Rams or Raiders (the other L.A. candidate) play if NFL owners decide in January to allow one or two teams to move here?
The answer is probably the Expo Line-friendly L.A. Coliseum, but apparently Angel Stadium in Anaheim and Dodger Stadium could be possible venues. Angel Stadium has Metrolink service and Dodger Stadium, of course, is serviced for baseball and some concerts by the Dodger Stadium Express. We’ll see what happens if an NFL team moves there.
Unfortunately, the longer-term stadiums for possible NFL teams don’t look as encouraging. The Chargers and Raiders want to build a ballpark on a 405-adjacent parcel in Carson that’s nowhere near Metro Rail. The Rams are hoping to build a stadium on the Hollywood Park site in Inglewood, about a mile walk from the future Crenshaw/LAX Line. The FAA has raised some concerns about that site, but it strikes me as having a slightly better shot given the long history of the racetrack and the Forum in Inglewood.
One other possibility, Charger fans: Mike Florio of NBC says one long-shot is for the owners of the Chargers and Rams to swap teams, thereby allowing the Chargers to move to Inglewood and the Rams to remain in St. Louis.
Good observations about the irony of transit agencies putting a ton of buses on the road at rush hour and those buses often running way behind schedule because they’re stuck in traffic.
The mobility plan recently approved by the L.A. City Council has a potential remedy: new bus-only lanes criss-crossing the city. Landofrye thinks that would be a wise move:
On a side note: To those who cry that drivers will suffer an even more severe loss of productive time if a lane is taken out for buses, I say:
(1) Congestion is already bad enough as it is at rush hour on streets like Santa Monica. How much worse can it get?
(2) Cars don’t have to pull over and wait for passengers to board every few blocks the way buses do, giving them a natural advantage under the same traffic conditions.
And (3) Cars can always use Waze to meander through side streets when traffic gets bad on arterials. Buses have to stick tho their arterial routes through thick and thin. (at least until intelligent technology allows for on-demand scheduling).
My slight hunch is that installing those bus lanes won’t exactly be a slam dunk and that motorists will have their rebuttals to 1, 2 and 3 above. That means that politicians will ultimately have to choose between bus riders and motorists. Observation: from the beginning of time until the present, I’d say motorists have largely won that battle, eh?
I certainly like it when government chooses to be interesting rather than boring.
Dec. 18: buses versus illegal motorists in the Wilshire peak hour bus lanes.
Dec. 15: more on the Metro bus service changes that began last Sunday.
Dec. 14: how will the Paris climate deal change our everyday lives in L.A. County?
Dec. 11: will we ever have a truly car-free city?
Dec. 10: hey, so when is the Expo Line to SaMo opening?
Categories: Transportation Headlines