Art of Transit:
Social media interestingness:
Metro Twitter Contest (ends tonight):
A conversation between Lyft and The Transport Politic’s Yonah Freemark regarding the ride-sharing company’s new campaign launched yesterday positioning it as a first-mile, last-mile solution to supplement public transit:
At the request of state lawmakers, the California High-Speed Rail Authority released a 2013 report from its consultant Parsons Brinckerhoff that estimated the initial cost to build the Burbank to Merced segment of the route had grown by more than $8 billion, not accounting for inflation. The increased costs and the perceived lack of transparency are a concern to Assembly and members of Congress and casting doubt on the viability of officials to manage the project.
High-speed rail authority officials contend that the report was part of an “iterative process” and were preliminary numbers. They’re also on record saying they have been transparent with critical information to the public and that they’re still looking for ways to build the project below the the current budgeted amount of $68 billion.
The billions of dollars being discussed are so unfathomably large they might start to lose their magnitude. So maybe it’s easiest to think of an $8 billion project increase as roughly the combined cost of the Purple Line Extension and the Crenshaw/LAX Line.
Good news for West Hollywood commuters. The West Hollywood City Council last night approved a new, free shuttle bus pilot program that will take riders from San Vicente Boulevard within WeHo city limits to the Hollywood/Highland Red Line Station in Hollywood.
The new bus service will be aimed at weekday commuters with service running Monday through Friday during peak hours and frequencies of 20 minutes or so. The route begins/ends at San Vicente Boulevard and runs along Santa Monica Boulevard to Highland Avenue and heads north to the station. Service is expected to begin in January and is funded until June, when the ridership will be assessed.
Madrid is about to unleash a new slew of strict laws that will ban half of the city’s cars, reduce speed limits and make transit free on days when the city’s notoriously polluted air reaches specific thresholds. The plan expands its restrictions as the amount of pollutants in the air increase. Here’s the outline excerpted from the article:
If on any single day, levels of nitrous oxide in central Madrid rise above 180 micrograms per cubic meter for more that two consecutive hours, a speed limit of 70 kmh (44 mph) will be introduced on the Madrid beltway. If this level continues for another day, non-resident cars will be banned from parking in inner Madrid.
If nitrous oxide levels reach 200 micrograms per cubic meter on any day, measures will be stricter still. Alternate driving days will be introduced for the large area of inner Madrid called the “Central Almond,” where a third of the city’s residents live.
At this level, public transit will be free for the entire city. But wait, there’s more:
If nitrous oxide levels reach above 400 micrograms per cubic meter (a level that Madrid has as yet never reached), then restrictions would be extended all the way to the outer beltway, effectively covering the entire city.
The article’s sub-title calls banning cars a “drastic” measure, and yes, due to its potential to restrict cars throughout the entire city it is unprecedented. But in Europe at least, banning or limiting car use for a period of time to reduce pollution seems to be gaining acceptance. In fact, Madrid already does it in certain parts of its historic downtown and Paris recently banned cars for a day in September.
It’s hard to imagine seeing something at this level in Los Angeles, but we have seen first-hand how reducing the number of the cars on the road works to quickly improve air quality. Remember Carmageddon?
As for those thinking about free fares, Metro made about $351 million from fare revenues in 2015, according to this year’s budget. Total operations costs were $1.408 billion. The public policy dilemma is that free fares may very well encourage higher ridership but even in a subsidized system (typical of most American transit agencies), where would the money come from?
Since we’re on the subject of banning cars from cities, check out this article with before and after photos of Amsterdam’s streets. The photos very simply highlight Amsterdam’s evolution from as a horse-and-buggy and automobile focused city with wide, open streets to one focused on walking and bicycling. It’s evidence that the city wasn’t always a mecca of bicycling and pedestrian activity, but that it took active planning to change it, and perhaps shows that even the most car-centric cities in America are capable of transforming themselves as well.
I occasionally like to include a few aviation articles in this space because hey, planes move people too. Click the link to this article to see video showing a single-engine Cirrus airplane piloted by the former CEO of Wal-Mart slowly drifting to the ground after he deployed its emergency parachute due to engine failure. Both he and his passenger survived the crash-landing.
Apparently, emergency parachutes have been installed on 30,000 Cirrus aircraft since the mid-90s, though only about 50 have ever been deployed. It’s estimated nearly 200 lives have been saved because of the parachutes. Now that I know one little mistake or malfunctioning widget no longer spells certain death, I think I’ll get my pilot’s license. On second thought, I’ll stick to being a passenger.
Don’t count on seeing parachutes on passenger planes any time soon though. Cirrus aircraft are single-engine propeller planes that only seat two to five people and are much smaller and lighter than commercial airliners.
Recent How We Rolls:
Nov. 3: why Supergirl should save trains or buses next, train signage issues at 7th/Metro, L.A. weighs slashing parking fines, how officials estimate ridership on future projects
Oct. 30: is The Force with mass transit?, a transit advocate — consumed by guilt — nonetheless buys a car, a commentary on the draft framework for Metro’s potential ballot measure.
Oct. 29: McDonald’s and the driving habits of Americans, to convert or not convert the Orange Line to rail and a great podcast on what keeps bridges from not falling down.
Oct. 28: bullet train officials say the project is on budget and on time, why transit is a tough sell in smaller cities, a really smart new bike.
Oct. 27: melting ice and record heat, Metro weighs Metrolink station relocation, 710 opposition at Board meeting, Chewbacca arrested in Ukraine.
Categories: Transportation Headlines