Metro Board approves new station at Aviation/96th as best option to connect to LAX people mover

newa2map

The Metro Board of Directors on Thursday unanimously approved a new light rail station at Aviation Boulevard and 96th Street along the Crenshaw/LAX Line as the best option to serve as the “gateway” transfer point to an Automated People Mover that would take people to terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. The people mover is being planned by Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), which would build the project.

The next steps: Metro must environmentally clear the station, design it and identify the funding before anything gets built. The Crenshaw/LAX Line is currently under construction and the new station would be added to that project. That project is scheduled to be completed in 2019; the people mover could be completed as early as 2022 according to the Metro staff report and officials with Mayor Eric Garcetti’s office said Thursday that the city will attempt to possibly accelerate that date.

“This is a historic day for LAX and a historic day for our city because we’re finally on the way to bringing rail to LAX,” Garcetti told the Metro Board on Thursday. “I think we’ll be able to fix a historic mistake of our past.” 

The Metro Green Line infamously came up two miles short of LAX and requires a shuttle bus ride to reach airport terminals. The new Aviation/96th station would also serve some Green Line trains; please see the conceptual operating map below.

People movers are a type of train and are used to connect to regional transit systems by large airports in the U.S. and abroad. The chief advantage of the people mover over the existing shuttle bus: the people mover would run on an elevated guideway above traffic while the shuttle bus shares roads with traffic.

The new Aviation/96th station would be about .4 miles north of the station to be built at Aviation and Century boulevards as part of the Crenshaw/LAX Line. The idea, according to Metro, is that the Aviation/96th station would be the gateway for passengers headed to LAX while the Aviation/Century station would connect riders to the many businesses along the Century Boulevard corridor.

Metro Board Members made it clear that the Aviation/96th station needs to be extraordinarily designed to serve as the airport gateway.

“The question before us is can 96th Street do what it needs to do to be a world class experience?,” asked Board Member Mike Bonin who co-authored a motion (posted after the jump) directing Metro to make the station an enclosed facility with a number of amenities including concourse areas, restrooms, LAX airline check-in and public art, among others. The motion was co-authored by Garcetti and Supervisors Don Knabe and Mark Ridley-Thomas.

LAWA is scheduled to finalize details on the people mover alignment and the number of stations near airport terminals in Dec. 2014. In a presentation to the LAWA Board in May, LAWA staff showed options that included two or four stations for the people mover within the central terminal horseshoe. Should LAWA move the people mover alignment back to 98th Street — as was previously studied — Metro would seek to make the Aviation/Century station as the primary connection point to the people mover.

Metro — in coordination with LAWA — has in the past couple of years looked at a number of options for connecting the airport terminals to the Metro Rail system. Among those was bringing light rail directly to the terminals or building a spur to a new airport transportation hub that is being planned east of LAX.

Ultimately, Metro studies found that a Metro Rail-people mover connection took about the same time and resulted in about the same ridership as having a light rail line run directly into the airport terminals. The Metro Rail-people mover connection also cost billions of dollars less and resulted in speedier train rides for Crenshaw/LAX Line passengers not heading to the airport.

In the future, it’s expected that about 57 percent of airport bound passengers would arrive by private car, 33 percent by shuttles, taxis and limos, eight percent by the Flyaway bus and one to two percent via transit buses and trains, according to the Metro staff report. About 66.6 million passengers used LAX in 2013, meaning even small percentages can add up to a lot of riders.

Metro Board Member Don Knabe raised a salient point several times in recent months: what guarantees are in place that LAWA will actually build the people mover? LAWA Executive Director Gina Marie Lindsey told the Metro Board on Thursday that traffic has gotten so bad in the airport’s horseshoe — up to 200,000 vehicles a day — that the airport must build the people mover, a consolidated rental car facility and a new ground transportation hub to steer more vehicles away from the terminals.

The Airport Metro Connector is one of the dozen transit projects to receive funding from the Measure R half-cent sales tax increase approved by 68 percent of Los Angeles County voters in 2008.

140529_amcoperations_2

Please see the motion on the Aviation/96th Street station that is posted after the jump.

image (2)

image (3)

image (4)

57 thoughts on “Metro Board approves new station at Aviation/96th as best option to connect to LAX people mover

  1. Eventually, the current Aviation/LAX station name should be scrapped in favor or naming the Aviation/96th as the new “LAX” station.

  2. Miami Metrorail is reasonably fast whereas LA light rail is slow as molasses .

  3. Has Metro considered looking at this from a non-LA native travelers’ perspective? Let’s say I’m a tourist from China. Where should I go to get back to LAX? Oh yes, that’s right 96th/Aviation Stations makes perfect sense over a station that says LAX Airport.

  4. I was looking at that top map of the LAX area again & have this question: Why couldn’t LAWA extend its proposed people-mover to the Aviation/Century station? Is it something that LAWA, for whatever reason, is unwilling to do? I’m not from anywhere near the Los Angeles area (I’m from NYC), but just using common sense I think that the people-mover would benefit from extending the rail line to serve the Aviation/Century Station (thereby eliminating the need for Metro to build an infill station at Aviation/96th St.). I don’t think it would cost as much money for LAWA to add another 1/2 mile or so for the people-mover to go to a station that’s now under construction; it may cost Metro a lot more cash to add an infill station just for the purpose of connecting to a rail line to LAX.

    I’ve said a few times that any rail connection to LAX is better than none at all, and I do think that Angelenos are legitimately closer to some sort of real rail service to LAX than ever. But I also believe that LAWA (and to a certain extend Metro as well) need to use common sense to deliver train service to LAX that doesn’t cost taxpayers unnecessarily.

Comments are closed.