Eight artists selected to create art for Expo Line Phase 2 stations

Olympic/26th Street Station artwork concept proposal by Constance Mallinson.

Olympic/26th Street Station artwork concept proposal by Constance Mallinson.

The Expo Line Construction Authority Board this afternoon authorized the CEO to issue art program contracts with eight highly-qualified and well-regarded artists, selected by panels of arts professionals and community members.

Selected artists include: Shizu Saldamando, Abel Alejandre, Susan Logoreci, Nzuji de Magalhaes, Constance Mallinson, Carmen Argote, Judithe Hernandez and Walter Hood. The artists were selected from a pool of over 400 submittals. Artworks will be included at each of the new rail stations currently under construction. More to follow as the artwork designs progress.

Interested in art opportunities with Metro? Visit metro.net/art and click on “Artist Opportunities” to download the latest Call to Artists for projects at El Monte Station.

17 thoughts on “Eight artists selected to create art for Expo Line Phase 2 stations

  1. I think we should be considered fortunate that artists are given opportunities to do their work due to a small percentage that is allocated for public art. Artists are people who need work just like anyone else. If artists didn’t get funded to either do public art projects, or commissioned to do artwork for private individuals or exhibit and sell their artwork through galleries, then fine artists would not have any platform to have their work create a dialogue with the public. These public art projects are funded by all of us and that “all of us” includes artists who are equally a part of the public.

  2. To give you an idea of how the MTA “works”, the “new” El Monte Transit Station was opened on Oct. 14, 2012, and has an EMPTY BUILDING AT IT, that COULD be used for a retail establishment that would benefit riders (a restaurant, a coffeeshop-SOMETHING!), but the building remains EMPTY! The so-called “artwork” that exists at the FRONT of the station (that riders rarely notice due to the buses they ride on going to the lower level, or BEHIND the buildings that obstruct the view of the “artwork”, was installed BEFORE THE STATION WAS COMPLETED! THIS is why the MTA has its head up its arse! “Art” installation at a facility before rider use? Seriously. This IS the way they do things!

  3. The money that is focused on art should be used to construct a better canopy system to block out the sun, rain and other elements. Every art inspired design has set back practicality, cost effectiveness and logical construction.

  4. That is so true! “Public Art” has NO BUSINESS being funded at the expense of a transit station’s practicality or efficiency! Especially when few even NOTICE the so-called “public art”, and it is placed in a part of the transit station where fewer riders notice it, then are there to catch a train or bus!

  5. If you believe in “public art” so much, then clearly you would support: a.) FUNDING YOURSELF the installation of whatever you consider to be “art” at any MTA bus or rail station, and b.) waiting until the newly constructed bus/rail station is ACTUALLY COMPLETED (and under rider use!), before this “art” gets installed. No bus/rail station construction project should have to be delayed to “accomodate public art”, at taxpayer cost! If the “artist” wants it there so bad, he/she can pay for it, and have it installed at his OWN expense! Not the taxpayers!

  6. Why not both? How about making train stations designed with a dedicated place for artists to showcase their work and spaces for retail?

    I think that would cover the best of both worlds: much efficient use of land space, better services, more money making opportunities for Metro, and helps out local businesses and artists.

  7. The only reason why the Art in the new stations does not work, is related to the fact that MTA has taken a micromanagement approach of the program. Artists are not creators of the artwork, they are just designers and paid about a 15% fee (of the allocated funds) to create a concept, in an area that is ben designated by the current burrocrats/”Art Planners” who do not have talent and vision to make great art. Look at the earlier stages of the program, the Gold Line Union-Pasadena is a good example of how stations can be unique and inspiring. What has to be done first is change the people that are in charge of the current art program, perhaps that will motivate some business to use a beautiful space to sell their products.

Comments are closed.