Metro releases its proposed decision and findings on the Constellation station for Westside Subway Extension

Metro has prepared a proposed decision with written findings regarding the reasonableness of the Westside Subway Extension’s Century City station at Constellation and Avenue of the Stars, which would tunnel under parts of the Beverly Hills High School campus. This follows the special meeting on this subject that was held last week at the request of the city of Beverly Hills.

The Metro Board of Directors will consider the proposed decision and findings from the hearing at their regular meeting this Thursday at 9 a.m. at Metro headquarters in downtown Los Angeles. The Board is also scheduled to consider approving the alignment and station locations for the second and third phases of the project, which run west from La Cienega Boulevard to the Westwood VA Hospital. Also scheduled is the continuation of last week’s special meeting so that public comment can be heard.

At last week’s hearing, Beverly Hills provided several presentations by their consultants that questioned and criticized Metro’s studies. Metro has concludedthat it is unsafe to build subway tunnels or a station parallel to Santa Monica Boulevard due to active earthquake faults.

Metro staff have instead proposed to locate the station under Constellation Boulevard, which would also have a higher projected ridership. Beverly Hills’ consultants said that it may be safe to build under Santa Monica Boulevard. The city also proposed alternative routes that would utilize part of Santa Monica Boulevard to reach a Constellation station.

Metro staff have considered the views presented by Beverly Hills along with the reports and conclusions of their own consultants and experts. Here are the proposed decisions and findings:

Proposed Decision and Findings

Based on the professional opinions of MTA’s internationally recognized experts in the field of seismology, geology and tunnel construction, staff recommends that the Board adopt the following findings and render its decision to locate the Century City Station at Constellation Boulevard/Avenue of the Stars:

1. Tunneling can be safely carried out beneath the Beverly Hills High School
(BHHS) campus;

2. Tunneling would not prevent future development of the BHHS campus;

3. Tunneling would not impact the use of the BHHS campus as an emergency
evacuation center;

4. Vibration and noise levels are within the FTA requirements and tunnel
operation is not anticipated to have adverse impacts. The tunnel construction
may cause some low levels of noise and vibration for a day or two;

5. Tunneling can be constructed and operated safely in gassy ground;

6. Oil wells do not pose an unmitigable risk to tunneling. Should they be
encountered, procedures will be in place for their safe removal and reabandonment;

7. In Century City, Constellation Boulevard is a viable option for a station
location, but Santa Monica Boulevard is not due to unacceptable seismic risk;

8. Tunneling through fault zones can be done safely;

9. MTA’s approach to risk management is correct;

10. Further site investigations will be conducted and measures will be
implemented to reduce risks to levels that are as low as reasonably practicable;

11. MTA and its engineering consultants have expertise designing and building tunnels and subway stations in Los Angeles; and

12. The Constellation Station will attract more riders than the station locations along Santa Monica Boulevard.

25 thoughts on “Metro releases its proposed decision and findings on the Constellation station for Westside Subway Extension

  1. I look forward to the Metro Board voting in favor of Constellation Blvd as the location for the subway station in Century City on Thursday at the regular meeting of the board.

  2. Each of the findings listed above is independently verifiable/defensible/provable. And put together, they point to one conclusion: Metro *should* locate the station at Constellation Blvd.

  3. Service the Beverly Center instead of San Vicente/Wilshire, then head to Century City. This route avoids BHHS. Do not build any stations in Beverly Hills and use the money saved to build this slight longer route.

  4. Great. Now build it on Constellations & Avenue of the Stars and let’s all get on with our lives.

    After this opens Beverly Hills will wonder how they ever lived without it.

  5. Pingback: 90210′s Way or the Highway: Despite Helpful Bev Hills Suggestions, Metro Will Probably Approve Its Own Purple Line Plans | LA News Talk Radio

  6. Bottom line question: Regardless who’s right or wrong, can the MTA AFFORD a potential lawsuit by Beverly Hills if they decide to go ahead with their proposed route to the Constellation Blvd. station?

  7. Morris,

    Pretty much every project now has a lawsuit. Look at Expo, both Phase 1 and Phase 2 had legal action. It certainly is not ideal and it can delay the project even if the outcome is good. However, sometimes you have to fight. Metro will never be able to build anything if everytime someone threatens a lawsuit they have to change their route or station locations. The precedent of doing whatever Beverly Hills wants now would severly hamper any future lines.

  8. How about building whatever BHS was planning to build at the SAME time as the subway?
    Instead of both sides spending tons of $$legal $$, spend it on an improved project for that location. So if BHS wanted a parking garage or a school building, why not excavate and build the subway box/tunnel, then the footings for the parking garage/school building at the same time?
    I know that seems too simple and there will be reasons why, but its worth a thought.

  9. Pingback: Today’s Headlines | Streetsblog Los Angeles

Comments are closed.