A public forum today at Union Station provided the public with their first look at conceptual visions for Union Station and the surrounding area by six architectural firms bidding to prepare a master plan for the facility.
Metro Executive Planning Director Martha Welborne told the several hundred people in attendance that the point of the vision boards was to energize the teams submitting bids to prepare the master plan, as well as energize the public that uses — or will someday use Union Station.
“These are acts of imagination, they are visions of a potential future,” Welborne said, emphasizing that the teams will be evaluated based on their technical proposals to prepare the Union Station master plan.
Listing the new Metro projects about to open or soon begin construction, Los Angeles Mayor and Metro Board Chair Antonio Villaraigosa said that the transit projects are opportunities to transform how the region looks and functions.
“And with high-speed rail coming down the pipeline, Union Station will truly be a hub not just for the region, but for the state,” said Los Angeles Mayor and Metro Board Chair Antonio Villaraigosa. “This is about preparing for the future.”
Los Angeles Councilman and Metro Board Member Jose Huizar made a similar point: “This is a place” — Union Station — “that will have a lot more eyes on it,” he said.
Some quick background: Metro purchased the historic rail terminal and 40 acres of land in April 2011. In anticipation of the purchase, the Metro Board of Directors in March 2011 directed a master planning process be undertaken for the Union Station property.
Twenty-two firms initially responded to Metro and in December the Board of Directors approved a short-list of six firms. As part of the bidding process, each firm was required to submit a 30-inch by 40-inch Vision Board showing a high-concept vision for Union Station in the year 2050.
Here are the boards in alphabetical order by the name of the firm — click on the image to see a larger version:
EE&K, a Perkins Eastman Company, in association with UNStudio
IBI Group/Foster+Partners
Grimshaw/Gruen
Moore Ruble Yudell Architects and Planners/Ten Arquitectos/West 8
NBBJ/Ingenhoven Architects
Renzo Piano Building Workshop/Parsons Transportation Group Inc.
Metro officials said that the Vision Boards are not part of the formal evaluation process of the six firms. Rather, they’re a means to begin the public engagement process and ignite inspiration about Union Station as a multi-modal regional transportation hub.
Metro staff will make their recommendation to the Metro Board on June 28. Upon approval by the Board, the Master Planning process could be completed in 24 months.
I like the idea of Union Station as the “center of a new garden city.” I’m all for that.
I particularly like EE&K and NBBJ/Ingenhoven’s ideas from what I can see. I particularly like the pedestrian entry plaza on NBBJ/Ingenhoven’s board (something I wrote about here: http://steven-white.com/2012/04/26/union-station-improving-pedestrian-connections/ ), but it does seem like they’ve completely changed the plaza at el Pueblo, which is certainly historic as well and should be preserved and improved rather than drastically changed.
These “visions” are an example of why architects should not be planning rail stations. Completely out of touch.
Do any architects and construction firms in the US, let alone in Los Angeles, have any experience constructing rail stations? Seeing how most of our light rail stations are built, my confidence is low.
Pingback: Today’s Headlines | Streetsblog Los Angeles
While I understand that this is initially a “vision” proposal, the schemes show a complete lack of understanding with regards to the city, surrounding context, transportation, and implementation. A visioning process should not throw these out the window…
I feel insulted that these design firms feel that they can get away without addressing these things by producing superficial imagery. For those participating firms with offices in LA, they should be ashamed. I hope the presentations to Metro showed a better understanding to our great city.
Hmmm. I have to agree with a lot of the other posters here. I see a lot of “ivory tower” architecture here.
I don’t see Union Station. It’s not the size of the illustration that’s the problem. I just don’t see Los Angeles in there. I’m no NIMBY reactionary, but a lot of these designs don’t say “Los Angeles” or “Union Station” to me.
They are being very creative and all that, but how much of this is going to be able to be built?
I’m all for forward vision IF the existing Union Station is ADDED to, not torn down….the beautiful glazed tiles are priceless, and the vaulted ceiling simply is archetectural history…I also don’t want a negative impact on Olvera St vendors and restaurants
I can’t help but notice a BLIMP in one of the drawings…
Really…???
There are only a handful of blimps in the entire USA, no blimp ports, and it’s a very slow mode of transportation…blimps are for folks that are NOT in a hurry…
Harumph…!!!
Too many train stations are getting these modern make-overs. When I travel by train I want to see what looks like a train station, not a park. Los Angeles is home to historic bridges, buildings and neighborhoods. Leave well enough alone.