Metro responds to second Beverly Hills report on Westside Subway Extension safety issues

In response to a second report commissioned by the city of Beverly Hills, Metro officials have again said that they stand by the agency’s seismic and tunneling safety reports on the Westside Subway Extension project.

Specifically, Metro officials stand by their conclusion that it is safer to build a subway station along Constellation Boulevard in Century City to avoid active earthquake fault zones and that tunneling under parts of the Beverly Hills High School campus to reach a Constellation station can be done safely and without hindering future development on the school grounds.

The second report was commissioned by the city of Beverly Hills — which opposes tunneling under the high school campus — and was written by the engineering firm Shannon and Wilson. In many respects, the Shannon and Wilson report agrees with Metro’s findings — in particular that tunneling under the high school can be done safely.

Metro’s response to the report is posted after the jump; here is a pdf file for download. And here is Metro’s response to another report commissioned by Beverly Hills prepared by the engineering firm Exponent.

The Shannon and Wilson report also recommended that Metro investigate some other options and locations for the Century City station. In its response, Metro found that it was not practical to move the Century City station to a location east of Century Park East to try to avoid earthquake faults — part of the station would likely still be in an earthquake fault zone and the station entrance would be 700 feet east of Century Park East, a long walk from the center of Century City.

In addition, the Shannon and Wilson report recommended that Metro investigate building the subway at street level along Santa Monica Boulevard. Metro discounts that possibility for several reasons, among them: the station platform would still be in an active earthquake fault zone, a train at street level would disrupt traffic on Santa Monica Boulevard and what remains of the old rail right-of-way along Santa Monica Boulevard is not long enough to accommodate a station and the trenches needed to bring the rails to the surface on both ends of the stations.

The Metro Board of Directors is scheduled to vote on an approval of the Westside Subway Extension’s Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report at their April 26 meeting; the Board’s Planning Committee is to consider the study at its 1 p.m. meeting today. As part of the vote, the full Board will select the alignment and station locations for the project.

Here is the Metro response to the Shannon and Wilson report:

Shannon and Wilson Response 4-17-12

 

 

6 replies

  1. If they can have a subway underneath the Pentagon, I think Beverly Hills High School can handle the “risk”.

    Put the station on Constellation and let’s move on.

  2. Not just a subway line- there’s a subway STATION directly under the Pentagon.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_%28WMATA_station%29

    Funniest thing about that station, is that instead of wall advertisements for mundane products or PSAs, the Pentagon station’s walls are covered in ads from defense contractors for things like F-22s, satellites, or military contractor services. DC is such a weird place.

  3. @Chris
    How is it weird? DC Metro does a fine job of combining both public and private interests at train stations as much as how transit agencies in Asia runs their mass transit systems.

    This isn’t any different from a train station near a major hospital in Tokyo which has ads about donating blood, the latest model Fujitsu and Hitachi CAT scanners, or pharmaceutical ads.

    IMO, this does a far better job at bringing in revenue for the benefit of both the agency and the best interests of the surroundings, than wasting taxpayer dollars on things like “local art” which bring in exactly zero cents in revenue and cost additional taxpayer money to clean and maintain them from graffiti vandalism.

  4. @Fukuzawa: The ‘local art’ is a requirement that politicians have put down in law. For Metro and several local cities, for major projects (sewer lines are an obivous exception to this rule) a certain portion of the funds have to be for art. Not defending this, just explaining it.